Showing posts with label Shiites. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shiites. Show all posts

Friday, March 16, 2007

Iraq 16 March 2007 - 3rd report

This is the first protest in Sadr City since the crackdown by U.S. and Iraqi troops began on February 14. This is somewhat reminiscent of 2004 when Sadr City was similarly tranquil until one day when an incident happened with a U.S. patrol and all hell broke us. That incident and the following bloodbath has been recounted by Martha Radatz of ABC News in a recent book. Radatz appeared on the NRP program "Fresh Air with Terry Gross" on March 1, 2007 and on subsequent NRP shows including on "All Things Considered" yesterday which omenously was The Ides of March. THREE reports below.

Hundreds of Shiites protest US base in Baghdad bastion
AFP Fri Mar 16, 10:07 AM ET

More than a thousand unarmed protesters demanded the removal of a US military base from east Baghdad's Sadr City on Friday, in the first sign of Shiite opposition to a new security plan.

Sadr City is a stronghold of radical cleric Moqtada al-Sadr's Mahdi Army militia and there had been fears that US and Iraqi forces would face violent opposition as they tried to gain control of the vast slum district.

Instead, Sadr's black-clad militia fighters melted away as the plan went into effect last month, and last week troops and police taking part in the operation were able to set up a "Joint Security Station" in the area.

On Thursday, however, one of Sadr City's two mayors who negotiated with the Americans and welcomed the creation of the fortified base was shot and wounded by unidentified gunmen, who killed a police colonel travelling with him.

Then, after Friday's weekly prayers, large crowds of Shiite worshippers unfurled banners demanding the base be abandoned and chanted: "No, no to America. No, no to Israel. No, no to Satan."

Armed and uniformed members of the US-trained Iraqi security forces joined in some of the chants, but there was no open display by militia fighters.

A tract distributed among the crowds by Sadr's office denounced what it described as "bases for the occupier on the lands of Sadr City".

Sadr himself was not present -- the US military believes he has gone to ground in Iraq's Shiite neighbour Iran -- but supporters carried his portrait and read out a statement he had apparently sent to them.

"The occupiers wanted to distort the reputation of the city and issued propaganda saying there are talks and cooperation between you and them. I am confident that you regard them as your enemy," he said.

"Don't surrender to them. You are their betters," he added.

The protest and the shooting of Mayor Rakim al-Darraji will be of concern to both the US military and Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's beleaguered Shiite-led government, which have been pleased by the lack of violence in Sadr City.

More then 90,000 Iraqi and US troops have been deployed around Baghdad as part of Operation Fardh al-Qanoon (Imposing Law), an ambitious plan to regain control of the city and quell sectarian violence between Sunnis and Shiites.

Since it was formally launched one month ago there has been little of the anticipated resistance and the city's murder rate is down sharply, although Sunni insurgents have continued to detonate car bombs almost daily.

On Thursday, before he heard of Darraji's shooting, the US commander in Baghdad said he had been pleasantly surprised by the calm in Sadr City.

"We've had a really good response from the people in the area. There's been no push-back at all so far from the Jaish al-Mahdi," General Joseph Fil said, using the Arabic term for Sadr's Mahdi Army.

Sadr's position on the Baghdad security plan has been ambiguous.

While a supporter of Maliki's government, the cleric is also a firm opponent of the US presence in Iraq, and has urged his Shiite supporters and the Iraqi security forces not to cooperate with what he calls "the enemy occupier".


Attack on Sadr official leads to tension
By QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA, Associated Press Writer
1:32 pm EDT Friday 16 March 2007

An attack against the mayor of Sadr City has created tension in the ranks of Shiite militiamen with some blaming a faction unhappy about cooperation with Americans, a local commander said Friday.

Gunmen opened fire on the convoy carrying Mayor Rahim al-Darraji Thursday in eastern Baghdad, seriously wounding him and killing two of his bodyguards, police and a local official said.

Al-Darraji was the principal negotiator in talks with U.S. officials that led to an agreement to pull Shiite fighters off the streets in Sadr City, a stronghold of the feared Mahdi Army, and a local commander said suspicion fell on a group of disaffected militiamen who are angry about the deal.

"This is a faction that enjoys some weight," the Mahdi Army commander said, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject.

He said the attack has created tension within the ranks of the militia and renewed debate about allowing the Americans to operate in Sadr City without resistance during a security sweep aimed at ending the sectarian violence that has raged since a Feb. 22, 2006, bombing of a Shiite shrine in Samarra.

Al-Darraji had also lobbied the Americans to bring reconstruction projects to Sadr City that would create jobs in the impoverished neighborhood. U.S. military commanders have said that could help disarm the largely unemployed men in the Mahdi Army.

One of the dead bodyguards was identified as police Lt. Col. Mohammad Mutashar Al-Freji, a friend of al-Darraji who was politically linked to radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.

The success in reining in al-Sadr's Mahdi Army militia, which fought fiercely against U.S. forces in 2004, is widely credited with the drop in execution-style killings, random shootings and rocket attacks during the month-old operation, and the attack against al-Darraji cast a shadow on that strategy.

Al-Sadr supporters also planned a demonstration Friday after traditional weekly prayer services to protest the establishment of a joint U.S.-Iraqi base in Sadr City, a sprawling district in eastern Baghdad.

Four U.S. soldiers, meanwhile, were killed in a roadside bombing Thursday in mainly Shiite eastern Baghdad and the military said it found a sophisticated weapon at the site that was of the type Washington believes is being supplied by Iran to Shiite militias.

Two more American troops were reported killed Friday — a U.S. soldier who died in an explosion Thursday in the volatile Sunni province of Salahuddin, northwest of Baghdad, and a Marine who died in a non-combat incident Thursday in Anbar province, west of the capital. A Marine also died Wednesday in a non-combat incident in Anbar.

At least 74 Americans have been killed in fighting since the U.S.-Iraqi security sweep to stop the sectarian violence in Baghdad began on Feb. 14 — most in Baghdad or volatile areas north of the capital and to the west in the Sunni insurgent stronghold of Anbar province. At least 3,208 members of the U.S. military have died since the Iraq war began four years ago next week, according to an Associated Press count.

U.S. Maj. Gen. Joseph F. Fil Jr., who is on his second tour of Iraq, acknowledged Thursday that the security crackdown was putting U.S. troops at greater risk in the capital simply because they were in the streets in greater numbers.

Fil also said the United States would have American soldiers in as many as 100 garrisons scattered throughout Baghdad by the time the last of the additional 20,000-plus troops allocated by President Bush arrive at the end of May. There are now 77 such posts, he said.

The bases will be a combination of Joint Security Stations — command and control centers operated jointly with Iraqis — and small combat outposts.

~~~cont'd~~~


Iraq cleric slams occupiers, Shi'ite mayor shot
By Claudia Parsons
Reuters 12:39 pm EDT Friday 16 March 2007

Radical Iraqi Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr urged his followers on Friday to oppose occupying troops, raising the pressure on U.S.-backed Iraqi forces conducting a security crackdown in Baghdad.

In a possible setback for the crackdown, the mayor of Sadr City, a Shi'ite militia stronghold in the capital, was wounded when gunmen opened fire on his car on Thursday.

Sheikh Raheem al-Darruji has been a key figure in facilitating recent joint operations in Sadr City, long a no-go area for U.S. forces and a bastion of the Mehdi Army, a militia loyal to the fiercely anti-American Sadr.

A statement from Sadr that was read out at prayers in Sadr City on Friday repeated his longheld opposition to the presence of U.S. forces in Iraq, and appeared to respond to recent statements by U.S. military officials who have said people in Sadr City were cooperating with them.

"I'm confident that you consider them (U.S. forces) your enemies," said the statement carrying Sadr's seal which was issued by his office in the holy city of Najaf as well as being read out to thousands of worshippers in Sadr City.

"I call upon you all to raise your voices all together and shout with one voice 'No, No, America'," the statement said.

Sadr City was viewed as a test of the Shi'ite-led Iraqi government's will to deal as firmly with Shi'ite militias as it does with Sunni Arab insurgents. U.S. commanders say they have met little resistance since launching operations 10 days ago.

Sadr's statement denounced U.S. forces as occupiers but did not mention Iraqi security forces. Sadr's political movement has expressed its support for the Baghdad plan as long as operations are conducted by Iraqi forces.

PROTEST AT U.S. FORCES

A Mehdi Army official said thousands of people demonstrated after prayers on Friday to reject the establishment of a joint U.S.-Iraqi security station in Sadr City. Television pictures showed at least hundreds of people.

Major General Joseph Fil, commander of U.S. troops in Baghdad, said on Thursday Sadr did appear to have instructed his followers to work with Iraqi security forces, if not with Americans. "I don't know that we have his support now," he said.

The chief spokesman for U.S. forces in Iraq, Major General William Caldwell, said this week U.S. forces were keeping a close track on Sadr and they believed he was in Iran. His aides have insisted he is still in Iraq.

Just a few months ago, Washington called Sadr's Mehdi Army militia the greatest threat to security in Iraq.

The radical young cleric headed uprisings against U.S. forces twice in 2004, but his political movement is now an important party in the government of Shi'ite Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki.

Thursday's attack on the mayor of Sadr City could complicate efforts to improve security there.

An Iraqi police source said Darruji was driving in a private car with a police colonel on Thursday in a district of Sadr City when gunmen in another car opened fire, killing the policeman and wounding the mayor.

The mayor's driver was also killed, a U.S. military spokesman said, but the mayor was in "good condition" on Friday.

"He has been helpful to the coalition and the efforts to establish the joint security station inside of Sadr City," the spokesman said.

(Additional reporting by Khalid Farhan in Najaf and Waleed Ibrahim in Baghdad)

Saturday, February 10, 2007

Surge this, George!

The surge ain't happening. Americans have not arrived in force although Gen. David Petraeus is now in charge and "the crackdown" is officially underway. Americans will continue to trickle in while the U.S. Congress continues to debate the surge and various non-binding resolutions as prelude to a real fight over continued funding for this failed war which will come later.

When Iraqis do show up for the surge, Iraq gov't soldiers who are mostly Shiites want to surge against Sunni militias but not Shiite militias. That is also Nouri al Maliki's unspoken position as voiced through an Iraqi position paper published yesterday or the day before (see third and final article below).

In sum and in short the surge is off to a sorry and inauspicious start. Also SecDef Robt Gates is already planning for what comes after a(nother) failed U.S. surge offensive (the 4th surge). Gates says this isn't the last straw while Gen. Petraeus says this is Iraq's last hope to avoid total chaos. Gates and Petraeus aren't even on the same page. Perfect example of the fly-by-the-seat-of-their-pants, make-it-up-as-they-go, disarticulated, incoherent, incompetent, doomed-to-fail U.S. strategy.

THREE articles linked below:

Infighting hampering Baghdad crackdown
quote:
Posted on Fri, Feb. 09, 2007

RYAN LENZ
Associated Press

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Iraqi commanders are urging the Americans to go after Sunni targets as the first focus of the military push to secure Baghdad, displaying a sectarian tilt that is delaying full implementation of the plan to drive gunmen from the streets, U.S. officers say.

American officers, interviewed at the sprawling Camp Victory base at the western edge of the capital, also acknowledge they are finding little in their initial searches of Baghdad neighborhoods - suggesting either they received faulty intelligence or that the massive publicity that preceded the operation gave militants time to slip away.

The chief military spokesman, Maj. Gen. William B. Caldwell, said Wednesday that the much-anticipated Baghdad security operation was under way. His remarks came about a month after President Bush announced he was dispatching 21,500 more troops to curb sectarian bloodletting.

Under the plan, Baghdad is to be divided into nine zones, with Iraqi and American soldiers working side-by-side to clear each sector of Shiite militias and Sunni insurgents so that reconstruction programs can begin in safety.

Although Iraqis have seen an increase in the number of checkpoints and other security measures, there is little sign of a "surge" of troops in the streets. U.S. officials insist the public will see a big increase soon.

U.S. officers told The Associated Press that the delays in implementing the plan were in part a result of disagreements between American and Iraqi commanders about what neighborhoods should be cleared first.

During joint planning sessions, the Iraqis have been urging U.S. officials to focus on neighborhoods believed to harbor Sunni insurgents, according to officers familiar with the discussions. They spoke on condition of anonymity because the subject is sensitive.

Several U.S. officers said the Iraqis, especially representatives of the Shiite-run Interior Ministry, played down the threat posed by the biggest Shiite militia, the Mahdi Army. They blamed much of the violence against Sunnis on fringe elements.

That led some U.S. officers to conclude that the Iraqis were afraid that confronting the Mahdi Army, led by anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, would undercut support for the Shiite-led government and trigger even more violence.

~~~snip~~~

Troop 'surge' has yet to materialize in Iraq
quote:
By Louise Roug
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

7:01 PM PST, February 9, 2007

BAGHDAD, Iraq -- A month after the Bush administration announced a "surge" in troops for Baghdad, Iraqis are still waiting for anything to change.

Fewer than 20 percent of the additional Iraqi and American troops have arrived so far. And the roughly 5,000 troops that have arrived have yet to make a visible influence in this sprawling city of 6 million people, where thousands of gunmen already patrol the streets.

U.S. officials are trying to manage expectations domestically and in Iraq, continually reasserting that troops slowly will take up their positions in the city over the coming months.

But after one of the bloodiest weeks since the U.S.-led invasion of 2003, Iraqis are increasingly impatient. A series of high-profile attacks on civilians and security forces killed more than 1,000 Iraqis and at least 33 U.S. troops in the last eight days.

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates has said he is investigating whether he can speed the pace of the troop buildup. But a senior Pentagon official said this week that it was unlikely that U.S. troops could be sent to Baghdad any faster than planned. The five brigades going to Baghdad are due to arrive one per month, with the final brigade arriving in May.

~~~snip~~~

As I have written before, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki who is a Shiite and owes his ministership to Moqtada al Sadr is all too happy to crack down on Sunni militias but fuggedabout cracking down on Shiite militias in general and Sadr's Mehdi Army in particular. This is yet another reason why Bush's so called surge, another reckless idea touted as well advised and advertized as a "new strategy", is bound to fail exactly like every over tactic that Bush has initiated in the Iraq war. Simply put, the overwhelming majority of Iraqis do not want an American occupation force in their country. Maliki and every other Iraqi conditioned by eons of intrigue easily play Bush and the stupid Americans as the fool they are. Iraqis want to take care of their own affairs and for the meddlesome, arrogant, dominating Americans to go home.

Iraq, U.S. Advised To Avoid Offensive Against Militiamen
quote:
Maliki's Influence Seen in Report

By Joshua Partlow
Washington Post Foreign Service
Friday, February 9, 2007; A14

BAGHDAD, Feb. 8 -- Iraqi and U.S. forces should not launch a military offensive against the militias -- most of them Shiite -- that are a major source of turmoil in Iraq, but should instead rely on nonviolent steps to bring militiamen into the political fold, according to an Iraqi report that draws largely on the views of prominent Shiite politicians.

"In the short-term at least, there can be no military offensive against the militias. Military confrontation, in the current climate, will only strengthen their appeal and swell their ranks," the Baghdad Institute for Public Policy Research concludes.

The institute said the 18-page report, "Dismantling Iraq's Militias," was based on a round-table discussion by six Shiite politicians, two Kurds and a Sunni Arab. Government officials said Thursday it would be considered in setting policy, but some here saw it as reflecting the private thinking of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki as more U.S. troops arrive to try to end the violence.

~~~snip~~~




--------------------
Faire l'amour, pas la guerre
Make love not war

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Generalissimo Genius George

What Wabbits has Generalissimo Genius George got Weft up his sleeve? When The Decider's Surge Option falls flat as it surely will, what then? The Man has pretty much managed to alienate about everyone.

First, there was the deBaathification campaign, and the war on the Sunni insurgency. Since then Genius George has angered the Kurds by an assault on the Iranian consulate on Kurdish territory in Irbil, Iraq where he ordered the arrest of Iranian guests of the Kurdish government.

Now Whim-shot is busy alienating Shiites including not only Iraq Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki who resents Duh-bya's decision to surge more U.S. troops in Baghdad, Bush is busy alienating other Shiite leaders as the article below attests.

Junior has two cards left up his gambler's sleeve IMO. First, Bush can still engineer the downfall and replacement of Iraq Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki. Second, Commander-in-Chief George W. Bush can manufacture a pretext to attack Iran.

There are efforts underway in the U.S. Congress to put conditions or sanctions on Bush's escalation of the war in Iraq and pending legislation that would demand he get Congressional approval before attacking Iran. Now, we have the distinct displease of being witness to Genius George at work as he fiddles with our future and the fundamentals of our democracy.

My question is what will Genius George do if the sovereign and democratically elected government of Iraq demands that all United States forces leave Iraq? What would Generalissimo Genius George decide to do then?

Top Iraqi condemns US over Iran
quote:
Last Updated: Wednesday, 17 January 2007, 13:17 GMT - BBC News

One of Iraq's most powerful Shia politicians has condemned the arrest of Iranians by US forces in Iraq as an attack on the country's sovereignty.

The comments by Abdel Aziz al-Hakim, made in a BBC interview, are seen as the strongest expression yet of Iraq's concern about the US approach to Iran.

They follow two recent US raids in which Iranians were arrested.

The remarks are interesting as Mr Hakim is seen as close to President Bush, says the BBC's Andrew North in Baghdad.

Late last year, US troops descended on Mr Hakim's residential compound in Baghdad and detained two Iranian officials.

They were later released, but last week, five more were detained at the Iranian liaison office in Irbil. They are still being held.

US officials say they are linked to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard which they allege trains and arms Iraqi insurgents.

Iran, which has demanded their immediate release, says they are diplomats engaged in legitimate work.

"Regardless of the Iranian position we consider these actions as incorrect," Mr Hakim, leader of the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, told the BBC.

"They represent a kind of attack on Iraq's sovereignty and we hope such things are not repeated."

On Sunday, Iraq's Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari said that Iraq needed a constructive relationship with Iran.

"We can't change the geographical reality that Iran is our neighbour. This is a delicate balance and we are treading a very thin line."

We fully respect the views, policies and strategy of the United States, which is the strongest ally to Iraq, but the Iraqi government has national interests of its own," Mr Zebari said.




--------------------
Faire l'amour, pas la guerre
Make love not war

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

Rush to war with Iran (cont'd)

The posted below is the latest entry in a thread I began on The Augusta Chronicle bulletin board titled Rush to war with Iran (cont'd) :

The kindling behavior preceding outbreak of hostilities with Iran is clearly building. To wit:

I have never claimed that U.S. military casualty statistics is the sum total of how the U.S. war in Iraq is progressing. Without diminishing the death of every precious life, 3020 would be a small price to pay as a nation in a just war of self-defense. We are invoved in a war of hegemony. The price that America is paying is far too high, and it pales in comparison to the price that Iraqis are paying by having a U.S. war of aggression foisted upon them.

Here is the state of affairs as of 16 January 2007. The Sunnis are outraged over the botched executions of Saddam Hussein and two of his hinchmen. The Kurds have both an historical and an ongoing relationship with neighboring Iran. The Kurds, our closest allies in Iraq, are outraged by U.S. actions against Iranian consular officials in Arbil, Iraq. The Kurds also do not want the U.S. fighting a proxy war aginst Iran in Iraq or in Kurdish territory. They don't like that prospect on bit.

Finally, the Shiites are outraged because we won't let them control affairs in Iraq. They won in the elections. The Iraq Prime Minister is a Shiite. The Shiites have close historical and ongoing ties with Iran. News reports say that Iranian intelligence is set to take over in southern Iraq. There is no doubt that United States will engineer the removal of Iraq Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki in short order because there is no evidence whatsoever that he will move against Shiite militias in Iraq including those militias alligned with Moqtada al Sadr.

The United States has moved naval forces into the Persian Gulf with the express purpose of targeting Iran's "very negative" behavior according to Secretary of Defense Robert Gates. So, although U.S. casualties are down at the moment - and that is good - the situation in Iraq and the region is more dire than ever - something like the calm before the storm IMHO.

Iran target of US Gulf military moves, Gates says
quote:
Mark Tran and agencies
Monday January 15, 2007
Guardian Unlimited

Increased US military activity in the Gulf is aimed at Iran's "very negative" behaviour, the Bush administration said today.

The defence secretary, Robert Gates, told reporters that the decision to deploy a Patriot missile battalion and a second aircraft carrier to the Gulf in conjunction with a "surge" of troops in Iraq was designed to show Iran that the US was not "overcommitted" in Iraq.

Speaking in Brussels after meeting Nato officials, Mr Gates said: "We are simply reaffirming that statement of the importance of the Gulf region to the United States and our determination to be an ongoing strong presence in that area for a long time into the future."

~~~snip~~~

Iraq edges closer to Iran, with or without the U.S.
quote:
By Louise Roug and Borzou Daragahi
Los Angels Times Staff Writers

January 16, 2007

BAGHDAD — The Iraqi government is moving to solidify relations with Iran, even as the United States turns up the rhetorical heat and bolsters its military forces to confront Tehran's influence in Iraq.

Iraq's foreign minister, responding to a U.S. raid on an Iranian office in Irbil in northern Iraq last week, said Monday that the government intended to transform similar Iranian agencies into consulates. The minister, Hoshyar Zebari, also said the government planned to negotiate more border entry points with Iran.

The U.S. military is still holding five Iranians detained in Thursday's raid. Army Gen. George W. Casey Jr., the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, said records seized in the raid and statements made by the detainees showed that at least some of them worked for Iran's intelligence service.

"I don't think there is any disagreement on the fact that these folks that we have captured are foreign intelligence agents in this country, working with Iraqis to destabilize Iraq and target coalition forces that are here at Iraq's request," Casey said Monday.

Zalmay Khalilzad, the U.S. ambassador to Iraq, added, "We are going after their networks in Iraq."

Iraqis, who have echoed Tehran's calls for the U.S. to release the five men, say the three-way standoff that has ensued reveals more about American meddling in Iraqi affairs than about Iranian influence.

"We, as Iraqis, have our own interest," Zebari said in an interview with The Times. "We are bound by geographic destiny to live with" Iran, adding that the Iraqi government wanted "to engage them constructively."

Zebari's comments reinforced the growing differences between the Iraqi government's approach and that of the Bush administration, which has rejected calls by the nonpartisan Iraq Study Group to open talks with Iran and Syria.

Administration officials accuse Iran of sowing anarchy and violence in the region.

Zebari's remarks came two days after Iraq and Iran announced a security agreement. "Terrorism threatens not only Iraq but all the regional countries," Iranian radio reported Sherwan Waili, Iraq's national security minister, as saying.

The overtures to Tehran also followed Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki's appointment last week of a security commander for Baghdad over the objections of U.S. officials, who favored another candidate.

American officials oppose the presence in Iraq of Iranian officials and members of the Revolutionary Guard, which is controlled by religious hard-liners in Iran. Washington and Tehran have been at odds for decades and are in a standoff over Iran's nuclear ambitions.

But to Iraq, Iran is its biggest trading partner and a source of tourist revenue, mainly from the thousands of Shiite Muslim pilgrims who travel to the holy cities of Najaf and Karbala every year.

In Iraq's semiautonomous Kurdish north, much of the economy is founded on trade with Iran and the smuggling of contraband into the Islamic Republic. Since the 1979 founding of Iran's theocracy, Kurdistan has been a transit point for banned alcohol, movies and satellite dishes.

A blow to the economy

The U.S. raid on the Iranian office, which handled visas and other paperwork for Iraqis traveling to Iran, struck at the heart of Kurdistan's economy, which depends on commercial ties with Iran facilitated through that office.

~~~snip~~~



--------------------
Faire l'amour, pas la guerre
Make love not war

Sunday, December 24, 2006

More shades of things to come in southern Iraq

Joint U.S.-Iraqi policy is increasingly designed to go after Moqtada's militias. That tactic will only inflame the Shiites in southern Iraq and turn it into the same caldron of chaos that is current in Baghdad and Anbar. This is another big tactical error in the even bigger strategic error of going to war in Iraq. To wit:

Iraqi forces battle Shiite militia in southern Iraq
Posted 12/24/2006 7:15 AM ET

BAGHDAD (AP) — A suicide bomber killed at least seven Iraqi policemen northeast of Baghdad Sunday, as Iraqi police and soldiers battled Shiite militiamen in a southern city, authorities said.

~~~snip~~~

In the south, at least five police have been killed in Samawah, where Shiite fighters attacked police headquarters and other government buildings with rocket-propelled grenades. Police have been battling the fighters since Friday.

Brig. Abdul-Karim Khalaf, spokesman for the Interior Ministry, did not identify the gunmen in Samawah, but police said they belonged to a militia formed by radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.

Al-Sadr has lost control of some elements of his militia, and it was unclear whether the gunmen in Samawah considered themselves loyal to the cleric or were a renegade group intent on local control.

About 40 suspected militiamen were captured, a police official said on condition of anonymity out of concern for his safety.

Khalaf said tribal leaders were trying to intervene in an effort to stop the violence in Samawah, the capital of Muthana province, about 230 miles southeast of Baghdad.

Muthana was under control of British forces until July, when it became the first province to revert to Iraqi control.

Maj. Charlie Burbridge, a spokesman for British forces in the neighboring province of Basra, said no multinational forces are left in Muthana province.

"From time to time, there have been clashes there," he said. "There are often tribal clashes, and rogue militias often exacerbate the situation. But the problem isn't big enough for provincial authorities to request help from multinational forces."

~~~snip~~~

Saturday, December 23, 2006

We losing Iraqi hearts and minds

The war in Iraq is battle for the hearts and minds of ordinary Iraqis - Shiites and Sunnis. The Kurds aren't really part of the civil war except where they interface with Arabs in disputed territory around Kirkuk and Mosul, and Kurds certainly aren't part of the Iraqi reisitance.

It is hard for the United States to win this battle for the hearts and minds of Sunnis and Shiites when we are seen as the foreign invader and occupier which does not share their religion, language, or customs. It is even more difficult to win those Arab hearts and minds when we are seen as the aggressor and occupier who kills civilians including women and children.

That is a common perception among both Sunnis and now Shiites. Their list of grievances against the American occupiers grows the longer we stay, and anti-American sentiment has become hardened to the point where the majority of Iraqis now support attacks on U.S. and U.K. troops.

Here are TWO of the latest examples:

Iraq town has little faith in U.S. trial of Marines
quote:
By Majid Hameed
Reuters Fri Dec 22, 10:42 AM ET

Iraqis in Haditha, where 24 unarmed civilians were killed last year, said on Friday four U.S. Marines charged with their murder should be executed, a penalty they will not face in the United States.

"They should hand them over to us so that we can kill them. They do not deserve a trial," said one young man who refused to give his name.

Khaled Salman, whose sister Asmaa was among 24 people killed in Haditha, gathered with friends in the early hours of Friday to watch television coverage of the charges being announced.

"Those soldiers killed 24 people. They killed women and children, isn't that enough for them be executed? Just so that the family can have peace," said Salman, 41.

"It's a political trial and it will not bring our rights back," said Salman, visibly angry.


Residents blame U.S. for deadly attack in Baquba
quote:
POSTED: 1924 GMT (0324 HKT), December 23, 2006

STORY HIGHLIGHT:
• No one has claimed responsibility for the Baquba rocket attack, official says
• U.S. makes no comment, investigates incident
• 13 people in captivity after Baghdad kidnapping, Iraqi Red Crescent says

BAQUBA, Iraq (CNN) -- Residents in Baquba blamed U.S. troops for a rocket attack that killed six people and wounded six others, including women and children, a Baquba joint coordination center official said Saturday.

Rockets landed on a residential neighborhood Friday, leveling one of the houses and partially damaging several others.

It was not known who attacked the town 37 miles northeast of Baghdad, and no one has claimed responsibility.

The U.S. military declined to comment Saturday but said it was investigating the incident.