Wednesday, March 12, 2008
JohnRandolphHardisonCain replies:
It is not I you effing idiot who keeps sending American service men and women into harms way IN A LOST CAUSE. I and others lobbied for this war never to have started five years ago on March 19. Bush claimed yesterday "Going to war in Iraq was the right decision 5 years ago, it is the right decision today, it will ALWAYS be the right decision." That is pure American hubris!
Bush and the warhawks wanted to claim victory on May 1, 2003. Didn't happen! You dolts insisted the surge is working. It isn't! You even posted ridiculous claims that "we have already won and there is nothing you can do about it." Just ridiculous. THE SURGE IS NOT WORKING. 12 U.S. soldiers have died in Iraq in the last three days. Yes, you struck a nerve you effing hypocrit! Why don't you go eff yourself!
-------------------------
Regardless of what The AC chooses to do or not do about Perro de Luna's "outrage" United States will NOT win military victories in Iraq and Afghanistan. The AC Editorial Staff (ACES) has been bull headed for 5 long years. They are incorrigible. It is Republican War Party partisans and right-wing rags like The Chronicle that gullible Americans down the primrose path to hell. The blood of Americans as well as the blood of innocent Iraqis and Afghani are on YOUR HANDS!
--------------------------------
There is NO MILITARY VICTORY TO BE HAD IN IRAQ you arrogant ahole!
-----------------------------------
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
No doubt, Saddam took great comfort from my online antiwar efforts while he was hiding in a spider hole in Iraq. Right!
Maybe the fact that the U.S. war in Iraq is ILLEGAL and a foreign military power (United States) occupies Iraq also EMBOLDENS Iraqi insurgents who refer to themselves as resistance fighters. Of course the occupying power, Uncle Sam, calls these Iraqi patriots "terrorists". Go figure.
This much is certain. Bush's decision to invade Iraq has ignited the flames of fed up Islam worldwide. United States is in the early stages of getting itself economically, political, and militarily defeated in Iraq and in Afghanistan - much to the delight of that indignant and outraged population.
Allah Akbar!
Are Iraqi Insurgents Emboldened by Antiwar Reporting?
| Quote: |
| By Alex Kingsbury U.S. News and World Report 2:45 pm EDT Wed 12 Mar 2008 Are insurgents in Iraq emboldened by voices in the news media expressing dissent or calling for troop withdrawals from Iraq? The short answer, according to a pair of Harvard economists, is yes. In a paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, the authors are quick to point out numerous caveats to their findings, based on data from mid-2003 through late 2007. Yet, their results show that insurgent groups are not devoid of reason and unresponsive to outside pressures and stimuli. "It shows that the various insurgent groups do respond to incentives and shows that a successful counter insurgency strategy should take that reality into account," says one of the paper's coauthors, Jonathan Monten, a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. The paper "Is There an 'Emboldenment' Effect in Iraq? Evidence From the Insurgency in Iraq" concludes the following: ~~~cont'd~~~ |
_________________
Augusta Alternative
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 4:04 pm
No doubt, Saddam took great comfort from my online antiwar efforts while he was hiding in a spider hole in Iraq. Right!
Maybe the fact that the U.S. war in Iraq is ILLEGAL and a foreign military power (United States) occupies Iraq also EMBOLDENS Iraqi insurgents who refer to themselves as resistance fighters. Of course the occupying power, Uncle Sam, calls these Iraqi patriots "terrorists". Go figure.
This much is certain. Bush's decision to invade Iraq has ignited the flames of fed up Islam worldwide. United States is in the early stages of getting itself economically, political, and militarily defeated in Iraq and in Afghanistan - much to the delight of that indignant and outraged population.
Allah Akbar!
Are Iraqi Insurgents Emboldened by Antiwar Reporting?
| Quote: |
| By Alex Kingsbury U.S. News and World Report 2:45 pm EDT Wed 12 Mar 2008 Are insurgents in Iraq emboldened by voices in the news media expressing dissent or calling for troop withdrawals from Iraq? The short answer, according to a pair of Harvard economists, is yes. In a paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, the authors are quick to point out numerous caveats to their findings, based on data from mid-2003 through late 2007. Yet, their results show that insurgent groups are not devoid of reason and unresponsive to outside pressures and stimuli. "It shows that the various insurgent groups do respond to incentives and shows that a successful counter insurgency strategy should take that reality into account," says one of the paper's coauthors, Jonathan Monten, a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. The paper "Is There an 'Emboldenment' Effect in Iraq? Evidence From the Insurgency in Iraq" concludes the following: ~~~cont'd~~~ |
_________________
Augusta Alternative
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 4:04 pm
JohnRandolphHardisonCain replies
Allah Akbar is a common expression throughout the Muslim world. Terrorists can no more claim it as their own as can the KKK claim the cross as their own. Get in touch with reality, Moon Puppy. My point is that millions if not billions of Muslims and other people in the world relish the United States finally getting sand kicked in its face. Get used to it. When we change our ways we might begin to regain respect. If McCain is more hawkish than Bush that will only expedite the defeat of United States I wrote about above. Word of God!
_________________
Augusta Alternative
JohnRandolphHardisonCain replies
Allah Akbar is a common expression throughout the Muslim world. Terrorists can no more claim it as their own as can the KKK claim the cross as their own. Get in touch with reality, Moon Puppy. My point is that millions if not billions of Muslims and other people in the world relish the United States finally getting sand kicked in its face. Get used to it. When we change our ways we might begin to regain respect. If McCain is more hawkish than Bush that will only expedite the defeat of United States I wrote about above. Word of God!
--------------------------------------
Here's what you good old American boys are forgetting. Bush has gone and jumped on the back of a tiger and he can't get off. I wrote a Letter to the Editor of The News and Farmer in Louisville, Georgia which was published on Feb 27, 2003. Here is an excerpt:
| Quote: |
| ...Nor do I think that defeating Iraq will automatically make the world safer against terrorism. Remember one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. George Bush will be seen as a winner if Saddam resigns. Both Bush and the UN will be seen as winners if Iraq disarms without military invasion. George Bush would be seen as a winner if he defeats Saddam and democratizes Iraq rapidly, but this seems unlikely. However, as soon as President Bush orders U.S. strikes on Iraq without clear provocation or international license, then he is labeled the aggressor, especially in the Arab world of 1 billion people. Even if Saddam then used chemical or biological weapons or destroys Iraq's oil wells, many will blame Bush for starting the war and the real trouble could begin. ... |
Bush ignited wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan. He hasn't captured those responsible for 9/11. Therefore Afghans and Pakistanis and Iraqis and Saudis and Libyans and Yemenis and Algerians and other Muslims who take their religion VERY seriously see the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as war on Islam. By God they will teach the invader a lesson. Nothing United States military can do will prevent an eventual economic, political, and military defeat in Iraq and Afghanistan and in Pakistan if necessary. There is no amount of non-nuclear or even nuclear weapons that will "bomb these people back to the stone age" or "make glass parking lots out of the Middle East and south Asia."
Bush and Cheney may well charge into Iran, but that won't stem the international uprising or even prevent more Muslim nations besides Pakistan from acquiring nuclear weapons. It might even result in a faster proliferation of nuclear weapons.
United States did not THINK before we went to war. We went to war in a spirit of revenge and capitalism (war profiteering). Today, five years into this clash of civilizations, Sec of State Rice said United States "made mistakes in reconstruction". I'll say! They also made mistakes in choosing to go to war under false pretexts and with ill defined goals and mixed motives at best. United States is in the process of getting taught another hard lesson like the Vietnamese taught us in the 1960s and 1970s. Those who don't learn from history are bound to repeat it.
_________________
Augusta Alternative
-------------------------------------
JohnRandolphHaridsonCain replies:
You really aren't really very bright are you, Perro de Luna? Because I posted the story does not mean I believe the story. Look a the fun I poked at this ridiculous piece of propaganda in the first post. I also gave reasons why insurgents ARE emboldened.
The neocon's blueprint for the Iraq war is called "Project for a New American Century". The idea was to seize the "unipolar moment" after the collapse of the Soviet Union while United States is the world's sole uncontested superpower to spread the U.S. economic and political system and make it dominant throughout the world through the use of military force.
And if you want to make light of neocons go ahead. Neocon Fred Kaplan is one of the authors of the surge. His academic "home" is the American Enterprise Institute. Kaplan was in the news today saying how he doesn't believe that ethnic cleansing has taken place in Iraq in the Sunni vs Shiite civil war. Right!
If Bush had been successful in subduing Iraq he would have taken the fight to Iran and Syria. Iraq was to be the first domino and a base of operations for projecting U.S. military power throughout the region. Bush even bragged about reshaping the Middle East.
Quess what? It didn't happen. The neocons include Iraq war architect Paul Wolfowitz (many if not most neocons are Jewish) didn't even think there were any Muslim holy sites in Iraq like this is Saudi Arabia. Duh! The Bush-Cheney administration and the neocns didn't study history very well if they didn't know Afghanistan has NEVER been subdued by a foreign invader in 2,500 years. Baghdad has been sacked at least 17 times throughout its long history but Iraq (or Mesopotamia) has NEVER been been successfully administered by a foreign power. NOTHING DIFFERENT THIS TIME EITHER.
Now go repeat your "America is still the greatest country in the world with the mightiest military in human history" mantra, little Moon Puppy dog. That and a quarter will get you a dog biscuit.
_________________
Augusta Alternative
-------------------------------------
JohnRandolphHardisonCain replies:
It is not I you effing idiot who keeps sending American service men and women into harms way IN A LOST CAUSE. I and others lobbied for this war never to have started five years ago on March 19. Bush claimed yesterday "Going to war in Iraq was the right decision 5 years ago, it is the right decision today, it will ALWAYS be the right decision." That is pure American hubris!
Bush and the warhawks wanted to claim victory on May 1, 2003. Didn't happen! You dolts insisted the surge is working. It isn't! You even posted ridiculous claims that "we have already won and there is nothing you can do about it." Just ridiculous. THE SURGE IS NOT WORKING. 12 U.S. soldiers have died in Iraq in the last three days. Yes, you struck a nerve you effing hypocrit! Why don't you go eff yourself!
There is NO MILITARY VICTORY TO BE HAD IN IRAQ you arrogant ahole!
_________________
Augusta Alternative
No comments:
Post a Comment